Peer Review Process and Paper Presentation
By Dr. Elsa-Sofia Morote
A webquest is an inquiry-oriented lessons. This webquest is prepared for understanding the peer review process and to help you to improve your own paper while reviewing others researchers papers.
To develop skills for your preparing a research paper you need to develop a thorough understanding of the different possibilities open to you as you present your paper. One way for you to get there is to critically analyze a number of papers and discuss them from multiple perspectives. That's your task in this exercise.
By the end of this lesson, you and your group will answer some questions presented in worksheets below. Each of you will have a specific role in the peer review committee. You will have a good understanding on how to write a successful research paper.
You and your team will receive 3 or More proposals. You will analyze them using several resources such as
Publication Manual- APA
Internet Resources
Materials provided by your professor
Proposal 1.
Proposal 2.
Proposal 3.
Proposal 4.
Proposal 5.
Proposal 6
We will create four new teams.
1) Team of stylists
proposal 5, proposal 2, proposal 3, proposal 4
2) Team of literature reviewers
proposal 1, and proposal 3, proposal 5, proposal 6
3) Designers
Proposal 1, proposal 2 and proposal 4
The Stylist Expert: You value APA style a great deal. You believe that too much time is wasted in today's research papers on unfocused activity and learners not knowing how to write it correctly. To you, a good research paper should present ideas clearly in APA style. All citations, tables and figures should follow the required style.
You also concern about definitions of terms and copywriting issues.
|
The Designer:
Your main concern is the design of the project. Is the project interesting for the conference that is planned to submit? Are the techniques used appropiate for the study? Are the conclusions valuable? |
The Literature review expert: Higher level thinking is everything to you. There's too much emphasis on factual recall in research today. The only justification for review of literature is if it opens up the possibility that students will have to analyze information, synthesize multiple perspectives, and take a stance on the merits of something. You also value research that allow for criticism on the part of the learner. | The presenters
Presenters will prepare their PowerPoint presentation with the major points. Presenters will present their papers and the experts: Lit review, Design and Style will critic them. |
THE PROCESS SECOND PART
Now we will mix up the groups and create a peer committee for each paper.
- There will be three committees:
When debriefing time is called, use the corresponding file to speak from as you report your results to the whole class via Blackboard's discussion board. You may use the document camera to point out your comments on text.
Ideally, this exercise will provide you with a larger pool of ideas to work with on your final project. The best research paper is yet to be written. It might be yours!
Copyrighted 2005-2016
http://www.internationalprofessor.com