A Student will be
able to:
- Identify
important facility considerations for the placement of technology in
an elementary or secondary classroom.
(1.1, 3.2, 4.2)
- Demonstrate
the process of installation and set-up of educational software on a
computer. (1.1, 2.4, 4.2)
- Describe the
process of "student proofing" a computer.
(3.1, 3.4, 4.2)
- Demonstrate
the use of a software evaluation form to determine a piece of
software is suitable for classroom use.
(1.1, 5.1, 5.3)
- Explain the
importance of software documentation.
( 1.1, 3.2, 3.3)
- Describe the
impact of user, instructional and geographical software attributes
on its classroom usefulness.
(1.1, 1.4, 2.0, 2.2, 3.1)
- Evaluate
software to determine its usefulness as an instructional strategy to
address key ideas of specific NYS Learning Standards.
(1.1, 1.3, 2.0, 5.1)
- Demonstrate
the process of correlating software attributes to learning NYS
standard key ideas. (2.0, 3.2, 3.3,
5.1)
- Classify
software as to its operational modality, design, presentation and
appropriate setting. (1.1, 1.4,
2.0, 2.2, 3.1)
- Describe the
use of instructional software in a thematic unit.
(1.1, 3.1, 3.3)
- Explain the
role of instructional and tool software as a means of instructional
support. (2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2,
3.3)
(Numeric designations are correlations to Standards for the
accreditation of programs in Educational Communications and
Instructional Technology (ECIT)
- Nine
(9) software evaluations using standard evaluation forms
- Three
(3) software evaluations and learning standard correlation
of software currently not identified in the
software correlation’s document (ron weber's
collection).
-
Completion of Class Activities and Authoring projects
- Class
presentation / demonstration of a software package used to
address the learning standards.
- A
comprehensive final exam
Grading Criteria
A+ Exemplary graduate work, worthy
of sharing with a wider audience
A Very good graduate work with
insight and well-justified conclusions
A- Very good graduate work with
some minor areas for improvement
B+ Satisfactory graduate work
with one or two important weaknesses identified
B Satisfactory graduate work
with a few major weaknesses identified
B- Barely meets the criteria
sufficient for graduate quality
C Major shortcomings in quality
of work
F Unacceptable
|
|